考证宝(kaozhengbao.com)

资料:Google and Uber have grabbed most of the attention regarding the advent of self-driving cars, but

考证宝 分享 时间: 加入收藏

考试:

问题:

资料:Google and Uber have grabbed most of the attention regarding the advent of self-driving cars, but on Sunday, Lyft threw down the ultimate challenge: A majority of autonomous vehicles for Lyft within a mere five years.   The bold claim was made by Lyft co-founder John Zimmer in a post on Medium outlining his company's vision for the next decade.   "Within five years a fully autonomous fleet of cars will provide the majority of Lyft rides across the country," said Zimmer, indicating that early versions of such cars have been in operation in San Francisco and Phoenix.   Usually when tech founders lay out their vision, it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability. That's what tech innovation is about. But in the case of self-driving cars, the situation is a bit more complicated.   Uber has already begun rolling out self-driving car tests in Pittsburgh and Google is hard at work on the same kind of solution on the West Coast. Therefore, talk of getting self-driving cars on the road is, at this point, less about the technology and more about logistics. We know Google has enough cash to triple down on any initiative it decides to tackle. And as the current ride-sharing leader in the U.S., Uber has enough market share-powered credibility that a future including self-driving Uber cars isn't unrealistic.   Today there are some internet-based ride sharing system but to overcome the critical mass the system has to be real-time, automated and extremely easy to use.   However in the case of Lyft, which continues to struggle against Uber (one report claims that Uber has over 80 percent market share in the U.S.), such a short timeline toward rolling out a fleet of self-driving cars seems somewhat ambitious. Nevertheless, Zimmer continues his vision essay with even more bold predictions.   "By 2025, private car ownership will all but end in major U.S. cities," says Zimmer, a prediction that, if it turns out to be true, would mean it would take just eight years for the majority of the human-driven cars on U.S. roads to disappear. Possible? Sure. Likely? Eight years seems like, once again, a bit of wishful thinking on Zimmer's part.   Remember, it hasn't even been 10 years since the arrival of the iPhone, and as recent events prove, smartphones are still a category that can yield catastrophic results if not done right. And those are just mobile devices, not vehicles entrusted with transporting and protecting human lives.   To be fair, Zimmer's essay does offer some facts and figures in an attempt to back up his positions, but much of it doesn't appear to take into account variables such as the heavily embedded interests of automobile companies still relying on consumer auto sales, as well as the many legal and roadway logistics that will need to be addressed in order to bring about this massive transformation in such a short time.   Oddly, Zimmer's vision does little to address the millions of human jobs that will be lost once self-driving cars displace not only taxi drivers, but truck drivers.   "We believe that in the first five or more years following the introduction of autonomous vehicles, the need for human drivers will actually increase, not decrease," writes Zimmer. "When autonomous cars can only solve a portion of those trips, more Lyft drivers will be needed to provide service to the growing market of former car owners," writes Zimmer.   But what about after five years, when autonomous cars can provide full service? What about the human drivers? The pushback from human drivers losing work will likely be another, major ripple in the evolution of self-driving cars, as well as other automated systems entering U.S. society in coming years.   However, none of these logistical issues diminish Zimmer's ideas. His vision of the future of autonomous vehicles seems quite logical and in step with most who work in and watch the space closely. But the speed bump in accepting his vision wholesale is his ambitious self-driving car timeline in general, and for Lyft in particular.
A:arrange them neatly
B:present clearly
C:design correctly
D:suggest properly

答案:

B

解析:

本题考查词义判断。 【关键词】lay out;mean 【主题句】Usually when tech founders lay out their vision it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability. 通常情况下,当科技公司的创始人展示他们的愿景时,通常会听到一些宏大的主张,几乎令人难以置信。 【解析】题目意为“在句子‘Usually when tech founders lay out their vision it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability.’中的lay out是指?”选项A意为“整齐地安排它们”,选项B意为“清楚地展示”,选项C意为“正确地设计”,选项D意为“适当地建议”,根据主题句句意。

相关标签:

综合知识     attention     regarding     grabbed     driving     知识    

推荐文章

蓄积器官是毒物在体内的蓄积部位,毒物在蓄积器官内的浓度高于其他器官,但对蓄积器官不一定显示毒作用。这种毒作用也可以通过某种病理生理机制,由另一个器官表现出来,这种器官叫作效应器官.根据上述定义。下列判 根据以下资料.回答61~65题。1952年.我国国内生产总值(GDP)仅为300亿美元。1960年,达到614亿美元。之后,每年的GDP总量呈稳步小幅上升态势。1972年突破1000亿美元,之后用了1 [银行真题]() 某家庭2012年收人为140000元,支出情况详见下图,则以下说法错误的有(  )。A.该家庭消费结构相对合理 根据以下资料.回答61~65题。1952年.我国国内生产总值(GDP)仅为300亿美元。1960年,达到614亿美元。之后,每年的GDP总量呈稳步小幅上升态势。1972年突破1000亿美元,之后用了1 偶然防卫是指在客观上被害人正在或即将对被告人或他人的人身进行不法侵害。但被告人主观上没有认识到这一点.出于非法侵害的目的而对被害人使用了武力。客观上起到了人身防卫的效果。根据上述定义,下列行为不属于偶 图形推理。请按每道题的答题要求作答。下题中缺少一个图,请从下边选项中选择一个插入上边图形以使上边的图形逻辑角度上能成双配对。() 根据以下资料,回答66~70题。下列说法,不能得到图形支持的是()。 在标准正态分布曲线下,正、负1个标准差范围内的面积占曲线下总面积的()。 ()
221381
领取福利

微信扫码领取福利

微信扫码分享